26 November 2007
The councillor behind the plans to
close high schools in Stoke-on-Trent has suffered a vote of no
confidence - from members of his own party.
Labour activists gave the
embarrassing rebuke to councillor Ian McLaughlan, portfolio holder for
children and young people, at a meeting of the Stoke-on-Trent Central
constituency.
They also passed a motion agreed to
remove party support from anyone backing the proposals.
If
that is officially adopted by Labour's Local Government Committee at
its next meeting, it could mean three of the party's most prominent
councillors would be unable to stand as Labour candidates at next
year's elections.
Theoretically, Mike Tappin, group leader and portfolio
holder for
resources, Mervin Smith, portfolio holder for regeneration, and Mr
McLaughlan himself would be unable to stand because they are members of
the cabinet which is pushing for the controversial schools restructure.
Insiders
believe this is unlikely to happen, however, particularly as regional
Labour Party directors have stepped in to the row, branding the vote of
no confidence "unconstitutional and therefore invalid".
So the Labour Party itself is not
listening to its members.
No wonder that Serco does not feel
the need to listen to the electorate!
We, the public, now
have the duty to make the Labour Party hierarchy and Serco listen to us
- for the sake of future generations of Stoke citizens.
The alternative proposals put
forward by MPs and Headteachers, although they are not yet finalised,
look to rebuild and refurbish the city's schools. For the Northern Area
of the city, this means:
- Refurbishing Brownhills
Maths and Computing College, in Tunstall. It would also benefit from a
sports strategy to enhance facilities.
- Rebuilding James Brindley Science College, in Chell, on its
current site. It would have 900 places.
- Refurbishing St Margaret Ward Catholic School and Arts
College, in Tunstall.
- Refurbishing
Haywood High, in Burslem. A joint sports village strategy would also be
developed, encompassing Dimensions and land at the rear of Port Vale,
to improve sports provision for pupils.
These proposals, in essence, fully
support the message given by the community to the Elected Mayor and
Council Manager at the meeting on 15th November.
We must support them as a
viable alternative.
It looks as though proper
consultation, focusing on each school, will be carried out on these
proposals to ask parents what they think, with public meetings held to
canvass support.
The Heads and MPs want
200,000 signatures in support of the new proposals
- let us give
them more than that!